The allure of Chanel is undeniable. Beyond the iconic tweed suits and the instantly recognizable No. 5 perfume, lies a makeup line that has captivated beauty enthusiasts for decades. Among its most coveted products? The Chanel blush. But for those familiar with the brand's evolution, a significant difference exists: the old versus the new formula. This article delves deep into the world of Chanel blush, specifically comparing the beloved old formula to its more recent iteration, exploring its texture, pigmentation, longevity, and overall performance. Follow me on IG for weekly looks and other musings. Instagram: [https://www.instagram.com/michimakesup](https://www.instagram.com/michimakesup) Thank you for watching! New…
Chanel Blush Comparisons: Old vs. New Formula
The debate surrounding the old and new Chanel blush formulas is a recurring theme within the beauty community. Many seasoned makeup lovers swear by the older iterations, citing superior qualities that seem to have been lost in the reformulation. To understand this sentiment, we need to dissect the key differences.
Texture and Pigmentation:
One of the most significant distinctions lies in the texture. The older Chanel blushes, often referred to as the "vintage" or "old formula," possessed a remarkably smooth, almost buttery texture. They were finely milled, offering a seamless application that blended effortlessly onto the skin. Pigmentation, while not overwhelmingly intense, was buildable and highly blendable, allowing for subtle washes of color or more dramatic, sculpted looks. This control was a major draw for many makeup artists and enthusiasts alike.
The newer Chanel blush formulas, while still smooth, often feel slightly more compressed and less creamy. The texture can sometimes feel a bit drier, resulting in a less seamless application. While the pigmentation is still good, it can sometimes appear slightly more intense initially, requiring a lighter hand to prevent an overly harsh application. This change in texture and initial pigmentation is a common point of contention among those who prefer the old formula's subtle buildability.
Longevity and Wear:
The longevity of the old formula was often praised for its lasting power. Many users reported that the blush would remain vibrant throughout the day, requiring minimal touch-ups. The creamy texture seemed to adhere well to the skin, providing a long-lasting flush.
The newer formulas, while still decent in terms of longevity, don't always match the staying power of their predecessors. While they last a reasonable amount of time, touch-ups may be needed, particularly in areas prone to fading, such as the apples of the cheeks. This difference in longevity is another key factor in the ongoing discussion about which formula reigns supreme.
Packaging and Aesthetics:
Both the old and new formulas have seen variations in packaging over the years. However, a general aesthetic difference can be observed. The older compacts often featured a more classic and understated design, sometimes with a simpler logo and less ornate detailing. The newer packaging, while still elegant, often incorporates more modern design elements and may feature different textures or finishes on the compact itself. This is a more subjective difference, but it adds to the overall nostalgic appeal of the old formula for some collectors and enthusiasts.
current url：https://kcqzgh.h361a.com/bag/chanel-blush-old-formula-89848